Wednesday 3 April 2013

This photo, if the Bible is more reliable?

Written By Unknown; About: This photo, if the Bible is more reliable? on Wednesday 3 April 2013

canonwaterproofcamerasreviews.blogspot.com ® This photo, if the Bible is more reliable?

Real question caused by Kevin A.R.T.: Would the Bible be more believable if it had photographs?

Yes, I said photographs. I know they didn’t have cameras back then. But you know what? It was the Word of God. Couldn’t He have given Moses, and Noah, and Adam “divine cameras”, where they could take pictures of these events, and put them in a scrapbook known later as the Bible?


Why not? I would believe Noah fit millions of species of animals on a boat and took care of them for hundreds of days with only a handful of people if I saw photographs.


This is exactly things to know about Would the Bible be more believable if it had photographs? that you’ll should certainly resolve difficulties automatically. Hopefully you like this’ll help in several ways; and to make everything better. Needing things to know about Would the Bible be more believable if it had photographs? could well be a cure in the foreseeable future.

Best answer:


Answer by Chosen One

Nope, People would still believe they were forged.


Answer by Amber

Eh, if they had cameras, they might have had photoshop.


Why is it so hard for an all-powerful, all-present being to show himself? Honestly, it would take all of what, 2 minutes?


Answer by Lightandtruth

Photos can be……arranged.


Answer by Fred M

yes, and audio so that I can hear the talking snake in Eden


Answer by phoebe61

All children’s Bibles have pictures.


Answer by bongernet

It would be more believable if there was ANY shred of evidence to support it.


Answer by No Chance Without Jesus

No but our Athiest friends might find the comic book bible more readable


If they look at all of creation….and still don’t believe, what good will pictures do?


Answer by Nik

great points


jesus was imaginary as u rightly pointed


Answer by The Reverend Soleil

Only if they also had cameras back in those days…


Answer by Cop #88

they did not have camras back then……..


-Christian


Answer by Gordon freeman

No, atheists would prove cameras did not exist back then


Answer by niqui

yes because most people I know won’t read anything but picture books


Answer by Jack T

it might, but most people would think there fake; i would and if they were original every1 would belive in it


Answer by witnessofJesus

for some who are proned to see pictures rather than words YES

when i was a child i had a bible with “stick figures” in it. i never went to that church again, i still dont know what church that was.

but when i had my conversion of faith, it was the testimony of a high school student that gave me a pocke bible without pictures. i believed because i read the words.


Answer by Free Stuff in 2012

Unfortunately, they also had access to Davine Photoshop. No one believed the pictures so they had to throw them out.


Answer by Jeff S

doesn’t help the creation museum.


Answer by to_tell_the_truth_2009

No, pictures would have no bearing. People will invent all manner of reasons for their disbelief. Most of it based on ignorance of scriptures and/or rebellion of being accountable to a Holy God.


Answer by .

It would not be more believable, but it would be more entertaining if the quaint short stories it contains were accompanied by some equally deceptive photos.


Answer by Lion of Judah

no, people would think they are forged. Even if they had video footage, they would think it forged. YES Tonya Midnight Heathen RETURN No Chance Without Maker Faire Loch Ness Monster Jeff Sdoesn Jack Tit Holy God Free Stuff Fred Myes FIST EX Davine Photoshop This photo, if the Bible is more reliable? canonwaterproofcamerasreviews blogspot com


Answer by θραυστήρων

Nope.


Answer by lherman79

Its so true, now I want to see a fresco of those old christian scenes with people holding polaroids.


Answer by RETURN OF THE FIST (EX L-5 T/C)

that is absolutely hilarious! have a star, photos in the bible how much cooler it would have been, maybe they could have made it into a comic as well…


Answer by thelarge17

The bible is as valid an historical document as any other comic book.


Answer by Master Zok

I think I would rather put my faith to the challenge.


Answer by Darold

An image perceived in the Heart and Mind of those who believe is very real.


Answer by Zdaddysdinosaurs

I say no because the just live by faith Heb 10:38 and seeing (i.e. photo’s ) is not faith that is living by sight. God is Spirit and we must worship Him in spirit. John 4:24 Spirit we cannot see. so photos would go against Gods overall plan. A wicked generation seeks after a sign. Matt 16:4


Answer by jill browne

I think you are asking about the quality of the Bible as a piece of evidence about the literal truth of the events it describes.


The same debates we have about whether the words of the Bible can be taken as the literal truth would apply to photos, if they had been available.


Some people think everything in the Bible actually happened exactly as the Bible describes. Others think the Bible is speaking in metaphors, not intended to be a literal historical document.


If there were photos taken by Moses and Noah, exactly the same debate would arise. Some people would say the photos show the literal truth, others would disagree.


For example, from the non-religious world, there are many photos of the Loch Ness Monster, Bigfoot, UFOs, aliens and so on. If you were to ask a hundred people if they though a picture of the Loch Ness Monster proves that the Monster exists, you would probably get 100 different reasons why they do or do not think so.


Finally, religious leaders from all traditions will say that there is always a need for faith. No matter how much evidence you collect to “prove” that Noah had an ark, eventually the test of faith is whether you believe it. In my opinion, to search for literal proof is beside the point – religion asks that you believe no matter whether there is proof or not. That is a big difference between religion and science.


Answer by Tonya Midnight Heathen Atheist

My bible has photographs. Of course they were taken after the fact. I don’t think they had cameras back then.


Answer by Aussiemum

You’d need more than photos. In this day and age, nothing is news unless you have sound and video. the quality wouldn’t matter – you could take it on a cheap video and have it all pixelated, but it would still make the news.


Memo to Jesus: for the second coming, make sure you pop up where someone at least has a camera phone or you will be replaced on the news by a cute doggy wedding or some bizarrely shaped fruit that some farmer in an obscure place found growing in his orchard.


Do know better?

Add your ultimate answer in their comments!


Camera van (Maker Faire)


Appearance via Camera van (Maker Faire)


2500 cameras and lenses, and the dashboard was covered in light meters. Some of them worked, and could be operated from the inside.


This photo, if the Bible is more reliable?